Letter from DOJ, ATF regarding new forms for sales of weapons to Illegals

Regardless of the inconveniences imposed on responsible FFL Weapons Dealers and this sorry sack of scum bags colluded in whatever scheme they've got going on to, as we NOW know is either 1. For Political Gain and Power Grabs 2. To get themselves out of trouble no matter how guilty they obviously are, how much the evidence proves it, at any cost.   

There are no other reasons for this administration, the DOJ, the Department of Jokers, to do ANYTHING in their minds, as they've become consumed with and don't have much time for all these corrupt activities.  These Jokers are actually the most Crooked Criminals in our Government, second only to Numero Uno, El Presidente ala Loco ...   The Top Dawg of Depraved Drudgery - The Daily Degraded Doer of Devil's Deeds... DONE..and not dirt cheap.. to our chagrin.  The letter is not a ticket to sell to illegals.  

A GOOD Solid, prosperous, and successful Arms Dealer wouldn't think of sinking to this administration's level, as the fumes from Fast and Furious still toxify the air around them, by selling to illegals.  You can turn ANY prospective buyer down, just on your gut feeling alone.  No one needs the business bad enough to sink to the baseness of Obama and Holder who are willing to let thousands spill their blood of life for their agenda to remove arms from law abiding citizens, yet boost the arsenals held by  hardened drug dealers and known killers.   SCREW YOU OBAMA, YODER, HOLDER, BREWER, NEWELL, and the rest of you worthless low life, trash..  Obama, WE MADE YOU, and not one cent in your slimy pocket came from lifting a finger of work other than to lift your Executive Ordering Pen to do what your predecessors worked with others, following rules to accomplish.  You never earned a penny in your life, unless whoring homo sex is "work".  

You resent the American People for their ingenuity, resolve, and undying fortitude to work how ever hard they have to to make it, to get by, or get to their goals,  YOU, are nothing but a Parasite - Hideous Hell Spawn.  Soon, you will be so FAR GONE.   And missed by none.  God Bless America.

Related articles

• Watch White House tout 'Fast & Furious' in 2009
• Did the DoJ hide whistleblower memos that prove officials lied to Congress?
• Fast and Furious: Covering up the Death of a U.S. Agent
• Here's What You Need To Know About The Gun Running Scandal That Could Destroy Obama's Attorney General
• REPORT: Senior ATF Agent In Charge Of Fast 'N Furious Gun Running Program Was Also Working For JPMorgan
• Issa reveals wiretap docs from DOJ mole
• Scathing GOP report on 'Fast and Furious' blames five ATF officials
• Inspector General Reports Blames Locals In Fast And Furious
• 'Fast and Furious' ATF Official Granted Paid Leave to Take 6-Figure Job at JP Morgan
• Why Would Anyone Trust Eric Holder?

Executive Order 13489 -- Presidential Records | The White House

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 09: U.S. President Barack Obama talks to the media before signing an Executive Order to cut waste and promote efficient spending across the federal government in the Oval Office at the White House on November 9, 2011 in Washington, DC. The order cuts spending on travel, technology devices and promotional items. (Image credit: Getty Images via @daylife)WASHINGTON - OCTOBER 19: U.S. President Barack Obama (R) speaks prior to signing the Executive Order on the White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanics during an East Room event at the White House October 19, 2010 in Washington, DC. The executive order placed a high priority on issues ranging from early childhood learning to higher education for the Hispanic community. (Image credit: Getty Images via @daylife)Executive Order 13489 -- Presidential Records | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/ExecutiveOrderPresidentialRecords

This is what Obama was busy working on and pushed through on his first day in Office, January 21, 2009.

The hypocrisy of him and his talking heads distracting the public (VOTERS) by demanding his formidable opponent release even more records of tax returns after the said opponent released tax records demanded he make public at the onset of this incumbent's dirty campaign bent on destroying ( "Kill Mitt Romney")  is beyond mind boggling.  THE AUDACITY of Obama's Lies, Offensives, Radical Attack, Bash, Trash and Smear tactics with no factual basis -  The AUDACITY OF OBAMA'S DECEIT and HYPOCRISY. It is incomprehensible.  The Character of the man in the position to Lead this Country is and should always be of paramount priority in even considering his eligibility to run.  And run, he has, from all the trivial "Leading" he's opted out of, then surfacing from behind when the smoke has cleared, to declare ( deceitfully ) his accomplishment, if the outcome was favorable, or blame and accuse others for his failure to make decisions.

This Executive Order, which violates, or wipes out all precedent laws to it's contrary, is an order that takes a pre-emptive strike against the future crimes This Usurper, Traitor, and American Hater planned to commit and/or was already in the process of committing...  This E.O. is clear in its intention to protect all presidential records changing the entire infrastructure of  CHECKS AND BALANCES in this Country.  The very foundation our Founding Fathers worked so hard to implement to protect the biggest threat to The United States of America,  an Enemy Within.   HE HAS ARRIVED.  His intentions are clear in the abysmal results.  No further proof is necessary as to this Traitor / Dictator wanna be's intentions and plans for an Agenda that is and has been devastating to The American People and The United States.   ON DAY ONE he was busy with concern for Covering his own Ass, not the economy, national security, or job creation, but his own selfish protection for the OUTRAGEOUS actions he was on his way to evoke against this country.  WE KNOW WHAT HE'S DONE, and this Executive Order might have seemed innocuous at the time, but nothing screams traitorous criminal louder than this.

Executive Order 13489 -- Presidential Records

Executive Order -- Presidential Records

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to establish policies and procedures governing the assertion of executive privilege by incumbent and former Presidents in connection with the release of Presidential records by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) pursuant to the Presidential Records Act of 1978, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.  Definitions.  For purposes of this order:

(a)  "Archivist" refers to the Archivist of the United States or his designee.

(b)  "NARA" refers to the National Archives and Records Administration.

(c)  "Presidential Records Act" refers to the Presidential Records Act, 44 U.S.C. 2201-2207.

(d)  "NARA regulations" refers to the NARA regulations implementing the Presidential Records Act, 36 C.F.R. Part 1270.

(e)  "Presidential records" refers to those documentary materials maintained by NARA pursuant to the Presidential Records Act, including Vice Presidential records.

(f)  "Former President" refers to the former President during whose term or terms of office particular Presidential records were created.

(g)  A "substantial question of executive privilege" exists if NARA's disclosure of Presidential records might impair national security (including the conduct of foreign relations), law enforcement, or the deliberative processes of the executive branch.

(h)  A "final court order" is a court order from which no appeal may be taken.

Sec. 2.  Notice of Intent to Disclose Presidential Records. 

(a)  When the Archivist provides notice to the incumbent and former Presidents of his intent to disclose Presidential records pursuant to section 1270.46 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist, using any guidelines provided by the incumbent and former Presidents, shall identify any specific materials, the disclosure of which he believes may raise a substantial question of executive privilege.  However, nothing in this order is intended to affect the right of the incumbent or former Presidents to invoke executive privilege with respect to materials not identified by the Archivist.  Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel).  The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative.

(b)  Upon the passage of 30 days after receipt by the incumbent and former Presidents of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Archivist may disclose the records covered by the notice, unless during that time period the Archivist has received a claim of executive privilege by the incumbent or former President or the Archivist has been instructed by the incumbent President or his designee to extend the time period for a time certain and with reason for the extension of time provided in the notice.  If a shorter period of time is required under the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations, the Archivist shall so indicate in the notice.

Sec. 3.  Claim of Executive Privilege by Incumbent President. 

(a)  Upon receipt of a notice of intent to disclose Presidential records, the Attorney General (directly or through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel) and the Counsel to the President shall review as they deem appropriate the records covered by the notice and consult with each other, the Archivist, and such other executive agencies as they deem appropriate concerning whether invocation of executive privilege is justified.

(b)  The Attorney General and the Counsel to the President, in the exercise of their discretion and after appropriate review and consultation under subsection (a) of this section, may jointly determine that invocation of executive privilege is not justified.  The Archivist shall be notified promptly of any such determination.

(c)  If either the Attorney General or the Counsel to the President believes that the circumstances justify invocation of executive privilege, the issue shall be presented to the President by the Counsel to the President and the Attorney General.

(d)  If the President decides to invoke executive privilege, the Counsel to the President shall notify the former President, the Archivist, and the Attorney General in writing of the claim of privilege and the specific Presidential records to which it relates.  After receiving such notice, the Archivist shall not disclose the privileged records unless directed to do so by an incumbent President or by a final court order.

Sec. 4.  Claim of Executive Privilege by Former President.

(a)  Upon receipt of a claim of executive privilege by a living former President, the Archivist shall consult with the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel), the Counsel to the President, and such other executive agencies as the Archivist deems appropriate concerning the Archivist's determination as to whether to honor the former President's claim of privilege or instead to disclose the Presidential records notwithstanding the claim of privilege.  Any determination under section 3 of this order that executive privilege shall not be invoked by the incumbent President shall not prejudice the Archivist's determination with respect to the former President's claim of privilege.

(b)  In making the determination referred to in subsection (a) of this section, the Archivist shall abide by any instructions given him by the incumbent President or his designee unless otherwise directed by a final court order.  The Archivist shall notify the incumbent and former Presidents of his determination at least 30 days prior to disclosure of the Presidential records, unless a shorter time period is required in the circumstances set forth in section 1270.44 of the NARA regulations.  Copies of the notice for the incumbent President shall be delivered to the President (through the Counsel to the President) and the Attorney General (through the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel).  The copy of the notice for the former President shall be delivered to the former President or his designated representative.

Sec. 5.  General Provisions. 

(a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

 (i)   authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof; or

 (ii)  functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budget, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Sec. 6.  Revocation.  Executive Order 13233 of November 1, 2001, is revoked.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
    January 21, 2009

Related articles

• Obama Signs 923 Executive Orders in 40 Months !
• Reception, Archivists
• Most Ethical and Transparent Administration Ever? (Open Thread)
• After defeat of cybersecurity bill, Obama weighs executive order
• White House next executive order, internet takeover
• White House considers executive order, leaves Internet takeover a possibility
• Brewer defies W.H. on immigration
• NEW RULES: Obama weighs executive-order on 'Internet security'
• Congress Can't Pass a Bill? No Problem! Obama Can Just Sign an Executive Order
• 1. Obama Calls on Romney for More Transparency

Explanation of the Farm Bill -

Who Does The Government Intend To Shoot? | The Daily Caller

Who Does The Government Intend To Shoot? | The Daily Caller

http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/17/who-does-the-government-intend-to-shoot

Who Does The Government Intend To Shoot?

Published: 9:40 AM 08/17/2012

inShare25

Ads by Google

• ClearOne Advantage™Debt Settlement Specialists. Free Debt Analysis! (800) 296-6140TryClearOne.com/Debt-Settlement

Photo by Oleg Volk, http://www.olegvolk.net/

By Major General Jerry Curry, USA (Ret.) 

The Social Security Administration (SSA) confirms that it is purchasing 174 thousand rounds of hollow point bullets to be delivered to 41 locations in major cities across the U.S.  No one has yet said what the purpose of these purchases is, though we are led to believe that they will be used only in an emergency to counteract and control civil unrest. Those against whom the hollow point bullets are to be used — those causing the civil unrest — must be American citizens; since the SSA has never been used overseas to help foreign countries maintain control of their citizens.

What would be the target of these 174, 000 rounds of hollow point bullets? It can’t simply be to control demonstrators or rioters. Hollow point bullets are so lethal that the Geneva Convention does not allow their use on the battle field in time of war. Hollow point bullets don’t just stop or hurt people, they penetrate the body, spread out, fragment and cause maximum damage to the body’s organs. Death often follows.

Potentially each hollow nose bullet represents a dead American. If so, why would the U.S. government want the SSA to kill 174,000 of our citizens, even during a time of civil unrest? Or is the purpose to kill 174,000 of the nation’s military and replace them with Department of Homeland Security (DHS) special security forces, forces loyal to the Administration, not to the Constitution?

All my life I’ve handled firearms. When a young boy growing up on my father’s farm in Pennsylvania Dad’s first rule of firearms training was, “Never point a gun at someone, in fun or otherwise, unless you intend to shoot them. If you shoot someone, shoot to kill.” I’ve never forgotten his admonition. It stayed with me through my Boy Scout training, when I enlisted in the army as a Private to fight in the Korea
War, during my days as a Ranger and Paratrooper and throughout my thirty-four year military career.

If this were only a one time order of ammunition, it could easily be dismissed. But there is a pattern here. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has ordered 46,000 rounds of hollow point ammunition. Notice that all of these purchases are for the lethal hollow nose bullets.  These bullets are not being purchased and stored for squirrel or coyote hunting. This is serious ammunition manufactured to be used for serious purposes.

In the war in Iraq, our military forces expended approximately 70 million rounds per year. In March DHS ordered 750 million rounds of hollow point ammunition. It then turned around and ordered an additional 750 million rounds of miscellaneous bullets including some that are capable of penetrating walls. This is enough ammunition to empty five rounds into the body of every living American citizen. Is this something we and the Congress should be concerned about? What’s the plan that requires so many dead Americans, even during times of civil unrest? Has Congress and the Administration vetted the plan in public.

Ads by Google

I fear that Congress won’t take these ammunition purchases seriously until they are all led from Capitol Hill in handcuffs. Why buy all this ammunition unless you plan to use it. Unknown to Congress, Does DHS plan to declare war on some country? Shouldn’t Congress hold hearings on why the Administration is stockpiling this ammunition all across the nation? How will it be used; what are the Administration’s plans?

Obama is a deadly serious, persistent man. Once he focuses on an object, he pursues it to the end. What is his focus here? All of these rounds of ammunition can only be used to kill American citizens, though there is enough ammunition being ordered to kill, in addition to every American citizen, also every Iranian, Syrian or Mexican. There is simply too much of it. And this much ammunition can’t be just for training, there aren’t that many weapons and “shooters” in the U.S. to fire it. Perhaps it is to be used to arm illegal immigrants?

We have enough military forces to maintain law and order in the U.S. even during times of civil unrest.

We have local police, backed up by each state’s National Guard, backed up by the Department of Defense. So in addition to all these forces why does DHS need its own private army? Why do the SSA, NOAA and other government agencies need to create their own civilian security forces armed with hollow nose bullets?

Were I the JCS, and if I wasn’t already fully briefed on this matter, I’d stop the purchase of hollow point bullets, ask the secretary of Defense why all this ammunition is being purchased and spread around the country? If I got answers like the ones Congress got during the investigation of Operation Fast and Furious – I’d start tracking all ammunition deliveries nationwide to find out what organizations and units are using them, for what purpose and, if it is not constitutional, prepare to counteract whatever it is that they are doing.

This is a deadly serious business. I hope I’m wrong, but something smells rotten. And If the Congress isn’t going to do its duty and investigate this matter fully, the military will have to protect the Constitution, the nation, and our citizens.

Jerry Curry is a decorated combat veteran, Army Aviator, Paratrooper, and Ranger, who for nearly forty years has served his country both in the military and as a Presidential political appointee.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/17/who-does-the-government-intend-to-shoot/#ixzz2445n4mvM

I Use and Abuse You, You Still Love Me ` The New Boss's Mantra

I HOPE HIS TRUE PLACE IN HISTORY IS REVEALED BEFORE MOST ARE REVERED ~ IN DEATH, THEY'RE  CHERISHED FOR THE TRUE HEROES THEY ARE.  

                    BUSH DESERVES BETTER

 This tells the story, why Bush was so bad at the end of his term.

Don’t just skim over this, it’s not very long, read it slowly and let it sink in. If in doubt, check it out!!!
was
The day the democrats took over NOT January 22nd 2009, it was actually January 3rd, 2007 the day the Democrats took over the House of Representatives and the Senate, at the very start of the 110th Congress.

The Democrat Party controlled a majority in both chambers for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.

For those who are listening to the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush's Fault", think about this:
January 3rd, 2007 was the day the Democrats took over the Senate and the Congress.

At the time:

The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77

The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%

The Unemployment rate was 4.6%

George Bush's Economic policies SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB GROWTH

Remember the day...

January 3rd, 2007 was the day that Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee.

The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?

BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!

Unemployment... to this CRISIS by (among MANY other things) dumping 5-6 TRILLION Dollars of toxic loans on the economy from YOUR Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac FIASCOES!

Bush asked Congress 17 TIMES to stop Fannie & Freddie - starting in 2001 because it was financially risky for the US economy.

And who took the THIRD highest pay-off from Fannie Mae AND Freddie Mac?

OBAMA

And who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie?

OBAMA and the Democrat Congress

So when someone tries to blame Bush,

REMEMBER JANUARY 3rd, 2007.... THE DAY THE DEMOCRATS TOOK OVER!"

Budgets do not come from the White House. They come from Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democrat Party.

Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 & 2011.

In that first year, they had to contend with George Bush, which caused them to compromise on spending, when Bush somewhat belatedly got tough on spending increases.

For 2009 though, Nancy Pelosi & Harry Reid bypassed George Bush entirely, passing continuing resolutions to keep government running until Barack Obama could take office. At that time, they passed a massive omnibus spending bill to complete the 2009 budgets.

And where was Barack Obama during this time? He was a member of that very Congress that passed all of these massive spending bills, and he signed the omnibus bill as President to complete 2009.

If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending. After that, Democrats in Congress took control of spending, and that includes Barack Obama, who voted for the budgets.

If Obama inherited anything, he inherited it from himself. In a nutshell, what Obama is saying is I inherited a deficit that I voted for and then I voted to expand that deficit four-fold since January 20th.

Yes Sir, They Miss You Now.  
I Missed You before you left.

Attorney For Goldman Sachs CEO Is Eric Holder's 'Best Friend'\

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/16/Attorney-For-Goldman-Sachs-CEO-Is-Eric-Holder-s-Best-Friend?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BigGovernment+%28Big+Government%29

ATTORNEY FOR GOLDMAN SACHS CEO IS ERIC HOLDER'S 'BEST FRIEND'

 27

 1

 63

 

---

Email Article

Print ArticleSend a Tip

by WYNTON HALL 16 Aug 2012 13 POST A COMMENT

The crony connections just keep on coming over at Eric Holder’s Department of Justice.

Last week, the Justice Department announced that it will not prosecute Goldman Sachs or any of its employees in a financial probe. 

Could that be because the attorney for Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein was none other than Attorney General Eric Holder’s “best friend” and former personal attorney, Reid Weingarten?

Or because in 2008, Goldman Sachs employees donated  $1,013,091 to Barack Obama?

Or because Goldman Sachs is the former client of Eric Holder’s and Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer’s law firm, Covington & Burling?

The conflicts of interest and cronyism at Holder’s Department of Justice are so many that it took a 27-page report by the Government Accountability Institute to catalog them all.

And lest one forget: Holder's best friend Reid Weingarten--who previously representedchild rapist Roman Polanski--is also the lawyer for former MF Global treasurer Edith O’Brien.  On Thursday, the New York Times reported that Holder's Justice Department will not be criminally charging Jon Corzine or any MF Global executives in that case either. 

Weingarten, who calls himself a “hard-core child of the ‘60s,” apparently has a soft spot for Wall Street fat cats.  "I feel like I'm in the French Revolution, defending the nobility against the howling mob," Weingarten told Bloomberg in 2002.

So, to recap, Goldman Sachs, which donated $1,013,091 to Barack Obama in 2008 and whose CEO is represented by Holder's best friend, will not face prosecution.

Nor will Obama bundler Jon Corzine, who raised at least $500,000 for Barack Obama.  

Indeed, Eric Holder’s Department of Justice has not charged, prosecuted, or convicted a single top Wall Street executive. 

Alas, pay-to-play justice and the Chicago Way are alive and well. 

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/16/Attorney-For-Goldman-Sachs-CEO-Is-Eric-Holder-s-Best-Friend?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BigGovernment+%28Big+Government%29