Monday, October 29, 2012

Four More Years- Tears, Fears, and Spears to the Spirit -- THE BIG LIE MUST FLY OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE

Aside from the Failures, Embezzling Schemes through his "Green Energy investments"..  That Green was ours, and he's devaluing that every minute he's in office. The Dollar's worth has gone down almost as low as this "Fraud in Chief", the Thief, Liar, and Ax Grinding Hater of America and her People has. Can't go Lower then LOBAMA.  

BENGHAZI - ENOUGH SAID

the rest is just another day in the life of the enemy within.  we will be destroyed if you let him back in.


Friday, October 26, 2012

PLEASE DON'T VOTE ON THE SURE BET FOR OUR COUNTRY"S DEMISE - Obama Abuses US ALL WITH LIES


This Country has never been in such a dyer emergency. The Great Depression will pale in comparison to what this out of control Tyrant and aspiring Dictator has in store for The United States of America and We, The People. What we know already is a nightmare that's come true.
What we never thought possible is happening to the Red, White, and Blue. A vote for Obama is a vote to waive your rights, all of our God given rights, and the rights guaranteed to us by our Constitution. This regime is one we should fear and see for what it is, a precursor to a state much like Nazi Germany, The Communist Soviet Union, Fascist Italy, and ultimate enslavement, after raping and pillaging their homes and belongings, of the People who believed these spinners of Propaganda. At least Hitler improved Germany's situation before he decided to eliminate over 6 million people he found "undesirable".

We are Jews to Hitler, as Americans to Obama. He's already begun the process. Look at the Big Picture of Parallels.





Thursday, October 25, 2012

Must-Watch Vid: Still Thinking About Voting for Obama? - YouTube

Must-Watch Vid: Still Thinking About Voting for Obama? - YouTube



PLEASE FELLOW AMERICANS, DO NOT BE FOOLED AGAIN. THIS MAN HAS NO MENTAL CONNECTION TO HIS SCRIPTED WORDS. THE LIES ARE SO AUDACIOUS IT TRIGGERS A SUSPENSION OF DISBELIEF. What This Man has in store for his unrestrained power, the final chapter of his last term, "Operation Destroy America and Her People" is clearly under way. The Big Picture is Clear. And the media is making sure you don't hear what's imminently here unless we collectively save ourselves by voting Obama out of his reckless disregard and aggressive agenda to put the United States Down where he believes she belongs, below third world countries in economic and military strength, putting us at risk for being obliterated by all who hate us, that now includes former allies and friends, and those who used to revere and respect us, regardless of their lack of love. We will be nothing close to the free country we have taken for granted. FREEDOM IS WHAT MAKES THIS COUNTRY EXCEPTIONAL. IT IS WHAT WE FIGHT FOR AND WHY WE WERE FEARED AND REVERED. We are on the edge of the cliff. Don't risk it in this lifetime, it's our last, and we won't have another if this man gets a chance for more time to ruin what he set out to ruin. GOD BLESS AMERICA.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

GAFFNEY: The real reason behind Benghazigate - Washington Times

GAFFNEY: The real reason behind Benghazigate - Washington Times

The Reason = TREASON

http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/22/the-real-reason-behind-benghazigate/#.UIdhzDA7ZuQ.twitter


GAFFNEY: The real reason behind Benghazigate

Was Obama gun-walking arms to jihadists?

  • COMMENTS (66)
  • SIZE: + / -
  • PRINT
    • Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on google_plusone_shareShare on redditShare on linkedinShare on stumbleuponShare on emailMore Sharing Services
    By Frank J. Gaffney Jr.
    -
    The Washington Times
    Monday, October 22, 2012

    FOLLOW US ON
    facebookFACEBOOK
    President Obama’s once seemingly unstoppable march toward re-election hit what he might call “bumps in the road” in Benghazi, Libya, late on Sept. 11, 2012. It might be more accurate to describe the effect of the well-planned and -executed, military-style attack on a diplomatic facility there as the political equivalent of a devastating improvised explosive device on the myth of the unassailability of the Obama record as commander in chief.
    Thanks to intrepid investigative reporting — notably by Bret Baier and Catherine Herridge at Fox News, Aaron Klein at WND.com and Clare Lopez at RadicalIslam.org — and information developed by congressional investigators, the mystery is beginning to unravel with regard to what happened that night and the reason for the subsequent, clumsy official cover-up now known as Benghazigate.
    The evidence suggests that the Obama administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East. Starting in March 2011, when American diplomat J. Christopher Stevens was designated the liaison to the “opposition” in Libya, the Obama administration has been arming them, including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.
    Once Moammar Gadhafi was overthrown, Stevens was appointed ambassador to the new Libya run by Mr. Belhadj and his friends. Not surprisingly, one of the most important priorities for someone in that position would be to try to find and secure the immense amount of armaments that had been cached by the dictator around the country and systematically looted during and after the revolution.
    One of the places in Libya most awash with such weapons in the most dangerous of hands is Benghazi. It now appears that Stevens was there — on a particularly risky day, with no security to speak of and despite now copiously documented concerns about his own safety and that of his subordinates — for another priority mission: sending arms recovered from the former regime’s stocks to the “opposition” in Syria. As in Libya, the insurgents are known to include al Qaeda and other Shariah-supremacist groups, including none other than Abdelhakim Belhadj.
    Fox News has chronicled how the Al Entisar, a Libyan-flagged vessel carrying 400 tons of cargo, docked on Sept. 6 in the Turkish port of Iskenderun. It reportedly supplied both humanitarian assistance and arms — including deadly SA-7 man-portable surface-to-air missiles — apparently destined for Islamists, again including al Qaeda elements, in Syria.
    What cries out for further investigation — and debate in the remaining days of this presidential election — is whether this shipment was part of a larger covert Obama effort to transfer weapons to our enemies that could make the Iran-Contra scandal, to say nothing of Operation Fast and Furious, pale by comparison.
    Investigative journalist Aaron Klein has reported that the “consulate in Benghazi” actually was no such thing. He observes that although administration officials have done nothing to correct that oft-repeated characterization of the facility where the murderous attack on Stevens and his colleagues was launched, they call it a “mission.” What Mr. Klein describes as a “shabby, nondescript building” that lacked any “major public security presence” was, according to an unnamed Middle Eastern security official, “routinely used by Stevens and others to coordinate with the Turkish, Saudi and Qatari governments on supporting the insurgencies in the Middle East, most prominently the rebels opposing Assad’s regime in Syria.”
    We know that Stevens‘ last official act was to hold such a meeting with an unidentified “Turkish diplomat.” Presumably, the conversation involved additional arms shipments to al Qaeda and its allies in Syria. It also may have involved getting more jihadi fighters there. After all, Mr. Klein reported last month that, according to sources in Egyptian security, our ambassador was playing a “central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria.”
    It gets worse. Last week, Center for Security Policy senior fellow and former career CIA officer Clare Lopez observed that there were two large warehouse-type buildings associated with the so-called “consulate” whose purpose has yet to be disclosed. As their contents were raided in the course of the attack, we may never know for sure whether they housed — and were known by the local jihadis to house — arms, perhaps administered by the two former Navy SEALs killed along with Stevens.
    What we do know is that the New York Times — one of the most slavishly pro-Obama publications in the country — reported in an Oct. 14 article, “Most of the arms shipped at the behest of Saudi Arabia and Qatar to supply Syrian rebel groups fighting the government of Bashar Assad are going to hard-line Islamic jihadists, and not the more secular opposition groups that the West wants to bolster.”
    In short, it seems President Obama has been engaged in gun-walking on a massive scale. The effect has been to equip America’s enemies to wage jihad not only against regimes it once claimed were our friends, but inevitably against us and our allies as well. That would explain his administration’s desperate and now failing bid to mislead the voters through the serial deflections of Benghazigate.
    Frank J. Gaffney Jr. is president of the Center for Security Policy (SecureFreedom.org), a columnist for The Washington Times and host of Secure Freedom Radio on WRC-AM (1260).


    Read more: GAFFNEY: The real reason behind Benghazigate - Washington Times http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/22/the-real-reason-behind-benghazigate/#.UIdhzDA7ZuQ.twitter#ixzz2ADRXszbr
    Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

    Tuesday, October 16, 2012

    Benghazi: Marines ‘supported’ by jihadists

    Benghazi: Marines ‘supported’ by jihadists

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/benghazi-marines-supported-by-jihadists/



    WND EXCLUSIVE

    BENGHAZI: MARINES 'SUPPORTED' BY JIHADISTS

    Evidence shows militia backing up U.S. forces made up of radical Islamists

    Ads by Google
    By John Rosenthal
    BRUSSELS, Belgium – Video and documentary evidence shows that a Libyan-government-sponsored militia that reportedly provided support to American Marines on the night of the Sept. 11 Benghazi attacks is a radical Islamic militia that, like the presumed assailants, flies the black flag of jihad.
    Ads by Google
    Over one month after the attacks – and despite a congressional hearing – the details of what occurred remain murky. But according to several largely concordant reports, certain broad outlines appear clear. It is generally agreed that the American consulate was attacked by Islamic extremists from a local Libyan militia. According to widely publicized speculations, the militia in question is thought to go by the name Ansar al-Shariah. Thus, for example, a recent New York Times article cites an eyewitness account attributing the attack to Ansar al-Shariah and notes that the witness claims to have seen the attackers “waving the black flag favored by such ultraconservative jihadis.”
    On the other hand, members of another local Libyan militia, operating under the orders of the Libyan government, are reported to have joined forces with American Marines on the night of the attacks. A unit from the militia is reported to have met a Marine detachment at Benghazi’s airport and accompanied the Marines to a supposedly secret “safe house” where consulate personnel had taken refuge.
    The “safe house,” however, would turn out to be neither secret nor safe. Instead, it would become the target of a second attack after the arrival of the Marines with their Libyan escort. Two Americans would die in this follow-up attack. Just how the assailants came to discover the location of the “safe house” is typically treated as a mystery.
    Despite citing the commander of the militia unit that allegedly joined in the rescue mission, the New York Times does not give the militia’s name. But both Reuters and the French daily Le Figaro, which provided highly similar accounts of the Benghazi events well before the Times report appeared, identify it as the Libya Shield Brigade. The Libya Shield Brigade is known to operate under the authority of the Libyan government. As it so happens, it is also known to fly the black flag of jihad.
    There is abundant evidence of this available in videos posted online by local Libyan sources. The black flag in question is, more precisely, two flags: (1) the solid black flag with the shahada or Islamic declaration of faith written on it in white that served as the original banner of al-Qaida and (2) the more elaborate black flag with a white circle in the middle that was introduced by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s al-Qaida in Iraq and that is commonly known nowadays as the al-Qaida flag.
    The flag pioneered by al-Zarqawi also, of course, features the shahada: “There is no God but God [Allah] and Mohammed is the messenger of God.”
    Like many other Libyan militias to have emerged from the last year’s NATO-supported rebellion against Moammar al-Gadhafi, the Libya Shield Brigade has used both black flags. Thus extensive footage of Libya Shield forces deployed around the desert oasis town of al-Kufra earlier this year shows Libya Shield vehicles flying both the new red-black-and-green Libyan national flag and the original version of the black jihadist flag.
    Libya Shield forces flying black jihadist flag, near al-Kufra, March 2012
    Libya Shield vehicle flying black jihadist flag, al-Kufra, March 2012
    The Libya Shield forces had reportedly been dispatched to al-Kufra by the Libyan government. Indeed, the red-and-gold brigade logo visible on the vehicles reads: “Ministry of Defense – Libya Shield Forces.” The footage in question was shot in mid-March, near the outset of the al-Kufra deployment.
    A video posted a few weeks later shows Libya Shield spokesman Hafez al-Aquri holding forth about the brigade’s mission in al-Kufra. Al-Aquri is seated at a desk and swivels back and forth on his chair as he talks. Hanging from the bookcase behind him is a large gold-fringed al-Qaida flag.
    Libya Shield spokesman Hafez al-Aquri, April, 2012
    That Libya Shield forces would fly the black flags of “There is no God but God and Mohammed is his messenger” is hardly surprising.
    As recounted in the forthcoming book
    “The Jihadist Plot: The Untold Story of al-Qaeda and the Libyan Rebellion,” like the great bulk of the Eastern Libyan militias that formed the backbone of the anti-Gadhafi rebellion, Libya Shield makes no secret of its Islamist principles and devotion to the Shariah. In the literal sense of the term, they are virtually all “Ansar al-Shariah” – which is to say, “Supporters of the Shariah.”
    Thus, in June, Libya Shield participated in a massive demonstration of Libyan mujahideen demanding the application of the Shariah. The demonstration included a motorized procession of militia units through the streets of Benghazi and featured not only innumerable al-Qaida flags, but even al-Qaida decals and headbands. Video of the demonstration can be viewed hereand here. The red-and-gold Libya Shield logo is clearly visible on several of the militia vehicles.
    The second video is embedded here, too:
    Moreover, according to Arabic-language Islamist websites, already in October 2011 – just days after the killing of Moammar al-Gadhafi – Libya Shield commander Wisam bin Hamid issued a declaration stating that “The Islamic shariah is a red line, we will not cede one rule of it, and Islam is the only law-giver and not [merely] the foundation [of the law].”
    Arabic sources report that bin Hamid commanded the rebel forces that besieged Gadhafi’s hometown of Sirte and ultimately captured and killed him. Per a glowing biography of bin Hamid that appeared on the jihadist forum al-Fetn.com, he is a veteran of jihad in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
    The jihadist inclinations of bin Hamid and his Libya Shield forces are not unknown to the U.S. government. Indeed, a recent study prepared by the research division of the Library of Congress links the Libya Shield Brigade to al-Qaida and even cites speculation that bin Hamid may be the leader of the al-Qaida network in Libya.
    But despite a widely cited report on the Long War Journal highlighting the government study, it appears to have escaped notice that the brigade in question is the very one that is alleged to have supported American Marines on the night of the Benghazi attacks. This is perhaps because the Long War Journal report merely mentions the name of bin Hamid’s militia in transliterated Arabic: Katiba Dir’ Libya. But Katiba Dir’ Libya means: Libya Shield Brigade.
    John Rosenthal writes on European politics and transatlantic security issues. His “The Jihadist Plot: The Untold Story of Al-Qaida and the Libyan Rebellion” is forthcoming from Encounter Books. You can follow his work at trans-int.com or on Facebook. The translations from Arabic are by Maureen Millington-Brodie.

    Obama confessing ineligibility?

    Obama confessing ineligibility? http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-confessing-ineligibility/

    WND EXCLUSIVE

    OBAMA CONFESSING INELIGIBILITY?

    'ThoughtPrint Decoding' unveils answer: Enforce the Constitution

    author-imageby BOB UNRUHEmail | Archive
    Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially.More ↓
    rss feed Subscribe to author feed

    Ads by Google
    121009obama
    A psychiatrist and forensic profiler who decoded O.J. Simpson’s “suicide note,” deciphered the JonBenet Ramsey ransom note and worked on the Natalee Holloway murder case now has analyzed the United Nations speech by Barack Obama and says the president confessed he’s ineligible for the Oval Office and told Americans they must use the Constitution to solve the problem.
    Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., author of “The Obama Confession: Secret Fear, Secret Fury,” at the suggestion of WND examined Obama’s Sept. 25 address at the U.N. and offered his analysis.
    Ads by Google
    He uses a unique psycholinguistic technique he calls “ThoughtPrint Decoding” to “read between the lines” of people’s statements – called “the cutting-edge of forensic science” by expert investigators.
    He’s not exactly new to the field, already having identified killers by studying ransom notes, emails, letters and police interviews to spot secret confessions. He decoded O.J.’s “suicide note” to confirm Simpson had committed a double murder. He deciphered the JonBenet ransom note from Boulder, Colo., to identify the child’s killer. He decrypted letters from BTK to predict that he was about to kill again – the only profiler to do so. He studied statements by Joran van der Sloot and Deepak Kalpoe to tie them to the slaying of Holloway. He showed how Casey Anthony secretly confessed to killing her daughter in 200 letters written to a jail mate. He even decoded Bill Clinton’s Lewinsky confession on TV, revealing the awful pain which led to Clinton’s self-sabotaging behavior.
    On Hodges’ website, Steven A. Egger, associate professor of criminology at the University of Houston, Clear Lake, wrote that Hodges’ technique is “becoming the cutting edge of forensic science.”
    “Dr. Hodges’ investigation of forensic documents in the Natalee Holloway case indicates that his ‘thoughtprint decoding method’ and ‘reading between the lines’ is, in fact, becoming a major contribution to law enforcement tools used by criminal investigators,” wrote Egger.
    Hodges says in his analysis of Obama’s U.N. address that the president “continues to reference attacks on America and our Constitution.”
    Obama said in the speech: “The attack son our civilians … were attacks on America … we will be relentless in tracking down the killers and bringing them to justice.”
    Hodges writes that Obama “again confesses his illegal presidency was an attack upon America, upon justice. So he promises to relentlessly track down his symbolic killing – destruction of – the Constitution.”
    Obama said “the attacks of the last two weeks are not simply an assault on America. They are also an assault on the very ideals upon which the United [States] was founded.
    Here, Hodges writes, Obama is “once more alluding to his constitutional attack. He can’t say it enough.”
    Obama further stated the “answer is enshrined in our laws: our Constitution … yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. Moreover, as president of our country, I [accept that people are going to] call me awful things every day.”
    Hodges says Obama “unconsciously reminds us that no one has confronted his blasphemy as a false president flaunting our most sacred beliefs — even as he calls his deed ‘awful.’ Obama’s succinct answer to his illegal presidency: enforce the Constitution.”
    Hodges concludes that the remarks by Obama at the U.N. reveal truths similar to those he perceived in Obama’s inaugural address.
    “Deep down a guilty person cannot stop looking at his misdeed, his crime. Obama’s brilliant unconscious constantly comprehends his guilt and is incessantly moved to confess. Remember, the deeper mind speaks symbolically in a narrative language using key images. It is much like reading a parable,” he said.
    “The first thing Obama does in his U.N. address is make reference to his foreign birth – exactly as he did in his 2009 Inauguration Day speech when his opening sentence introduced the word ‘borne’ and thus the question, ‘Where was I born?’” Hodges concludes.
    “At the U.N., Obama begins to tell ‘about an American named … who was born in a town called … He came to love … the people of Africa … and he would carry that commitment throughout his life.
    “His super intelligence, his deeper unconscious is actually saying, ‘I’m going to tell you the secret story of my supposed American birth – I was really born in Africa to which I have a lifelong commitment.’ His story pictures a foreigner traveling between America and Africa – matching an identical idea in his inaugural address,” the author explains.
    “Next Obama unconsciously confesses his illegal presidency was a secret revolution against America. Obama instantly provides a second crucial birth marker linking ‘birth’ to ‘revolution,’” Hodges said. “Note the phrase: ‘the revolution, he supported the birth.’ The super-intel suggests that Obama, the foreigner in America, leads a secret revolution in which his foreign birth subverts America’s constitutional requirements.”
    Hodges continues: “In his inauguration address, Obama repeatedly appealed to citizens to hold him to constitutional standards. He declared America was at ‘war against a far-reaching (foreign) network of violence and hatred’ – suggesting as a foreigner he had violently usurped the oath of office.
    “In the U.N. speech, we find numerous calls for a change in leadership – Obama’s unconscious moral compass guiding America to the truth about his fraudulent presidency and what we need to do. Just one example,” he said. “‘We supported a transition of leadership … because the interests of the people were not being served by a corrupt status quo.’ His secret call for a change in the U.S. presidency matches his inauguration speech story about how his foreign-born father could not have been served in a Washington, D.C., restaurant – suggesting Obama cannot serve or be seated as an illegal president.”
    Obama also called for a leader to emerge to lead the protests in the Middle East.
    “We have seen peaceful transitions of power … a new president … a courageous dissident has been elected to parliament … Around the globe, people are making their voices heard,” Obama stated.
    Hodges’ says Obama “again suggests that – should he win a second term – the people must march on Washington to oppose his presidency. Absolutely the only way he’ll ever be confronted.”
    Hodges earlier said most people don’t understand the intensity and revelations in Obama’s statements.
    He has, for example, endured a trauma that controls his life, and Hodges suggests Obama’s statements often imply “the exact opposite.”
    In a column later, he wrote that research indicates the human subconscious reveals the truth about the person.
    “Keep in mind the super intelligence possesses a deeper moral compass – guilty people confess especially when they get around God,” Hodges said. “Obama did so in his inauguration speech just after taking the presidential oath on Jan 20, 2009, with his hand on the same Bible Lincoln used, looking the chief justice and the American people – and, most importantly, God – in the eye, swearing to his intentions and identity. It is the most unique moment in American presidential inauguration history – and totally apart from race.”
    Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)