A Collection of Information Available to the public. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness." This IS IT ~ TIME to reclaim our Freedom from an out of control Tyrannical Government. LIVE FREE and Fight the Good Fight To Keep That Right.
Sunday, March 24, 2013
TX A.G. Greg Abbott speaks about Americans' bank accounts being invaded by the Federal Gov't
Eroding your rights at a bank near you, thanks to the Obama-nation
Friday, March 22, 2013
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Saturday, March 16, 2013
» Is martial law the ultimate goal? Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
» Is martial law the ultimate goal? Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
http://www.infowars.com/is-martial-law-the-ultimate-goal/
Daniel Detwiler
teapartyorg.ning.com
February 1, 2013
With everything happening to this country of ours it is getting harder and harder to maintain a cool head and not jump to conclusions but if we sit back and view the last four years as well as what’s happening now an image is starting to appear of what might possibly be our future.
During President Obama’s first term he laid the ground work. President Obama issued over 144 executive orders, many dealing with martial law. As the Supreme Court already opinioned when looking at President Lincolns use of martial law, “Martial law … destroys every guarantee of the Constitution.”. This means when martial law is declared we as Americans have no rights at all.
During President Obama’s first term he wrote Executive Orders granting the government the power to take over all communications media, electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals. He also wrote an Executive Order where the government can take over all modes of transportation and control of the highways and sea ports. That means Obama can confiscate your horse, your donkeys, your bicycle or even your riding lawn mower. All forms of transportation. Executive orders signed by Obama also include railroads, inland water ways, public storage facilities, airports and airplanes including commercial planes can all be taken over by the government.
Think that’s bad, well it gets worse, much worse.
Executive Orders have also been signed allowing the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision. To take over all health education and welfare functions. To allow the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate and establish new locations for populations, AND grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute Industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
If that doesn’t scare you then look at this. An Executive order has also been signed which allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit, and the flow of money in U.S. financial institutions in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when the president declares a state of emergency, Congress cannot review the action for six months.
Now why that last part that congress cannot review the action for six months? To understand why President Obama wanted that executive order lets look at what martial law is. Martial law is the suspension of civil authority and the imposition of military authority. When we say a region or country is “under martial law,” we mean to say that the military is in control of the area, that it acts as the police, as the courts, as the legislature. The president is the commander in chief of the military and as such in full control of the martial law. Seeing how the constitution is suspended during martial law and the President is in control the only ones able to stop martial law is the congress. In effect that Executive order that says Congress cannot review the action for six months in effect give the President full unchallenged control for six months.
In a nut shell a President can declare martial law, would have six months of free reign to do as he pleases while rounding up any congressional opposition to his martial law and detaining them indefinitely and doing this totally legally.
In order for a president to declare martial law he must have a valid reason to do so. For that lets look at our present situation. Today we have a president whom has openly declared war on the second amendment to our constitution. This is causing a great deal of civil unrest in the nation. Being told that their actions are unconstitutional doesn’t slow the President down at all, in fact it emboldens him to push even harder. To top that off our President is also pushing us to the fiscal cliff of ruin. When asked about the out of control spending our President replies that we do not have a spending problem. Top that off with our government printing money as fast as possible as well as demanding unrestricted borrowing powers we can see we will be heading to a financial meltdown very soon. A financial meltdown coupled with civil unrest over constitutional violations would be the catalyst for open revolt and exactly what would be needed in order to openly declare martial law. Then we all are doomed.
http://www.infowars.com/is-martial-law-the-ultimate-goal/
Is martial law the ultimate goal?
teapartyorg.ning.com
February 1, 2013
With everything happening to this country of ours it is getting harder and harder to maintain a cool head and not jump to conclusions but if we sit back and view the last four years as well as what’s happening now an image is starting to appear of what might possibly be our future.
During President Obama’s first term he laid the ground work. President Obama issued over 144 executive orders, many dealing with martial law. As the Supreme Court already opinioned when looking at President Lincolns use of martial law, “Martial law … destroys every guarantee of the Constitution.”. This means when martial law is declared we as Americans have no rights at all.
During President Obama’s first term he wrote Executive Orders granting the government the power to take over all communications media, electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals. He also wrote an Executive Order where the government can take over all modes of transportation and control of the highways and sea ports. That means Obama can confiscate your horse, your donkeys, your bicycle or even your riding lawn mower. All forms of transportation. Executive orders signed by Obama also include railroads, inland water ways, public storage facilities, airports and airplanes including commercial planes can all be taken over by the government.
Think that’s bad, well it gets worse, much worse.
Executive Orders have also been signed allowing the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision. To take over all health education and welfare functions. To allow the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate and establish new locations for populations, AND grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute Industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.
If that doesn’t scare you then look at this. An Executive order has also been signed which allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit, and the flow of money in U.S. financial institutions in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when the president declares a state of emergency, Congress cannot review the action for six months.
Now why that last part that congress cannot review the action for six months? To understand why President Obama wanted that executive order lets look at what martial law is. Martial law is the suspension of civil authority and the imposition of military authority. When we say a region or country is “under martial law,” we mean to say that the military is in control of the area, that it acts as the police, as the courts, as the legislature. The president is the commander in chief of the military and as such in full control of the martial law. Seeing how the constitution is suspended during martial law and the President is in control the only ones able to stop martial law is the congress. In effect that Executive order that says Congress cannot review the action for six months in effect give the President full unchallenged control for six months.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
In a nut shell a President can declare martial law, would have six months of free reign to do as he pleases while rounding up any congressional opposition to his martial law and detaining them indefinitely and doing this totally legally.
In order for a president to declare martial law he must have a valid reason to do so. For that lets look at our present situation. Today we have a president whom has openly declared war on the second amendment to our constitution. This is causing a great deal of civil unrest in the nation. Being told that their actions are unconstitutional doesn’t slow the President down at all, in fact it emboldens him to push even harder. To top that off our President is also pushing us to the fiscal cliff of ruin. When asked about the out of control spending our President replies that we do not have a spending problem. Top that off with our government printing money as fast as possible as well as demanding unrestricted borrowing powers we can see we will be heading to a financial meltdown very soon. A financial meltdown coupled with civil unrest over constitutional violations would be the catalyst for open revolt and exactly what would be needed in order to openly declare martial law. Then we all are doomed.
This article was posted: Friday, February 1, 2013 at 11:49 am
Thursday, March 14, 2013
Bill Whittle on Gun Control
Best 7 minutes on gun control I have ever seen! - YouTube
Bill Whittle on Gun Control ~ What we're really trying to control is violence, murder and insanity ....
Political Diary: What Does Buffett Really Think of Obama? - WSJ.com
Political Diary: What Does Buffett Really Think of Obama? - WSJ.com
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324205404578147212933227742.html
In a New York Times op-ed published Sunday,
Mr. Buffett opposed tax increases on those making less than $500,000.
This undercutting of the Obama agenda occurs just as Mr. Obama is
negotiating a tax deal and trying to force Republicans to accept rate
hikes beginning on households making $250,000.
Then Mr. Buffett appeared Monday in a TV interview with Charlie Rose and sang the praises of J.P. Morgan Chase JPM +1.67% CEO Jamie Dimon as a potential Treasury Secretary. Mr. Dimon has been conspicuous among bank CEOs for criticizing the president's economic policies, and in particular financial regulations flowing from the 2010 Dodd-Frank law.
But Mr. Buffett called Mr. Dimon "terrific" and told Mr. Rose, "If we did run into problems in markets, I think he'd actually be the best person you could have in the job."
Warren Buffett may be Mr. Obama's top cheerleader in the business community, but he appears to disagree with tax and regulatory policies at the center of the Obama agenda. Does this make Mr. Buffett hypocritical? No more so than does his advocacy of the Buffett Rule, given how little of his own fortune he exposes to taxation.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324205404578147212933227742.html
What Does Buffett Really Think of Obama?
more in Political Diary
»
By JAMES FREEMAN
Warren Buffett is President Obama's most important ally in the business community. A signature Obama proposal to raise taxes, the Buffett Rule, even bears the name of the billionaire investor. And the president has frequently appealed to the authority of Mr. Buffett to defend his own policies. But statements this week from Mr. Buffett suggest that he's not entirely sold on those Obama policies.Related Video
Assistant editorial page editor James Freeman
on Warren Buffett's op-ed in the New York Times supporting raising
rates on individuals earning more than $500,000. Photos: Associated
Press
Then Mr. Buffett appeared Monday in a TV interview with Charlie Rose and sang the praises of J.P. Morgan Chase JPM +1.67% CEO Jamie Dimon as a potential Treasury Secretary. Mr. Dimon has been conspicuous among bank CEOs for criticizing the president's economic policies, and in particular financial regulations flowing from the 2010 Dodd-Frank law.
But Mr. Buffett called Mr. Dimon "terrific" and told Mr. Rose, "If we did run into problems in markets, I think he'd actually be the best person you could have in the job."
Warren Buffett may be Mr. Obama's top cheerleader in the business community, but he appears to disagree with tax and regulatory policies at the center of the Obama agenda. Does this make Mr. Buffett hypocritical? No more so than does his advocacy of the Buffett Rule, given how little of his own fortune he exposes to taxation.
Saturday, March 9, 2013
Amazing - Obama Caught in Bald-Faced Lie on White House Sequester - YouTube
Amazing - Obama Caught in Bald-Faced Lie on White House Sequester - YouTube
Sequester your compulsive pathological lying ass... Obama cannot control his lying or his out of control corrupt behaviors, he knows no other way, it's not in his DNA.
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
Bill O'Reilly unloads on Alan Colmes: 'You are lying! You are lying!' [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller
Bill O'Reilly unloads on Alan Colmes: 'You are lying! You are lying!' [VIDEO] | The Daily Caller
Alan Colmbes gets called out and SHOWN UP for falling for the Big CON, the LIES, hence being the LIAR HE IS
Alan Colmbes gets called out and SHOWN UP for falling for the Big CON, the LIES, hence being the LIAR HE IS
Monday, March 4, 2013
Saturday, March 2, 2013
Virginia Tech shooting victim speaks at UB - Connecticut Post
Virginia Tech shooting victim speaks at UB - Connecticut Post
http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Virginia-Tech-shooting-victim-speaks-at-UB-4031102.php
http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Virginia-Tech-shooting-victim-speaks-at-UB-4031102.php
Virginia Tech shooting victim speaks at UB
Linda Conner Lambeck
Updated 6:43 am, Tuesday, November 13, 2012
- Colin Goddard, survivor of the April 16, 2007 shooting the killed 32 people at Virginia Tech University, discusses the documentary, Living for 32, at the University of Bridgeport on Monday, November 12, 2012. Goddard was shot four times in the incident. Photo: Brian A. Pounds | Buy This Photo
Comments (
Printable Version
Email This
Font
BRIDGEPORT -- The day he was shot four times in a French class at Virginia Tech was a game changer for Colin Goddard.
That's when he went from college student to gun control advocate.
On Monday, Goddard took that message to the University of Bridgeport, where dozens of hands in the audience shot up when he asked how many knew someone who had been shot.
Many knew Moin Hassan, the graduate student gunned down at a Fairfield Avenue market in September.
Reginee Reese, sitting in the back of the student center, took out her hand to start listing all the gun violence victims she knew: a boyfriend, an uncle and, most recently, a 15-year-old cousin, Keijahnae Robinson, killed while sitting on her front porch.
"I want to know how do you get your voice heard so people listen to you," asked Reese, 18.
Goddard, on a campaign to better regulate the sale of guns, told Reese he decided to stand up and not to be defined by that April 16, 2007, shooting that left 32 dead and 17, himself included, injured. Instead, he decided to focus on change.
The audience saw a screening of "Living for 32," a documentary film about the shooting, and also heard from Ethan Rodriguez-Torrent, a Yale University senior who survived the Aurora Colo., theater massacre in July.
This was Rodriguez-Torrent's first time talking to a large crowd about the event. He called it therapy.
"I think there are a lot of people across the country who really don't understand the daily violence that goes on in places like Bridgeport or New Haven or Chicago or D.C. They just literally don't get it," Rodriguez-Torrent said.
So far in Bridgeport this year, there have been 21 homicides.
"There is no returning to how it was," said Goddard of his experience and his campaign. "I have to find a way to turn that negative experience toward something positive."
Goddard said his main focus is getting a bill passed in Congress that would make it more difficult to sell guns to dangerous people. He wants all states held to the same standard.
The killer in the Virginia Tech shooting, who had a history of mental health issues, had two semiautomatic handguns, dozens of 10- and 15-round magazines, and 400 rounds of hollow-point ammunition.
After he recovered from his wounds, Goddard went to work for the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, going undercover to gun shows, where he was able to buy guns with little or no identification or background checks.
Lisa E. Nelson, a city resident, asked if change will really happen.
"How do you feel about where we are nationally," Nelson asked.
"I'm hopeful," said Goddard. "I think we are ripe for change."
He said he knows it is an uphill battle.
Goddard rejects the argument some have made that if other students had been armed that day at Norris Hall, they could have defended themselves and fewer would have died.
"We can't have shootouts on campuses. That would be ridiculous," Goddard said.
Once he takes care of the supply side -- what he considers the easy part -- Goddard plans to focus on the issue of demand for guns, making people less likely to want guns to solve problems.
"That is the harder part," he said.
John Marshall Lee told the audience one thing they can do is report things they see. There is a way they can do so anonymously. "You'll feel stronger if you do," he said.
Reese, meanwhile, wants to stage a "100-mom march" through the streets of Bridgeport.
A representative of Connecticut Against Gun Violence, in the back of the room, gave Reese her card before she left.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Comments
Add Your Comment
New to the site?
Already a member?