http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/21/us/politics/stealth-campaign-from-the-white-house-for-an-immigration-bill.html?_r=0
White House Offers Stealth Campaign to Support Immigration Bill
Doug Mills/The New York Times
By MICHAEL D. SHEAR
Published: June 20, 2013
WASHINGTON — The hide-out has no sign on the door, but inside Dirksen
201 is a spare suite of offices the White House has transformed into its
covert immigration war room on Capitol Hill.
Related
-
Border Deal by 2 in G.O.P. Lifts Chances of Immigration Bill (June 21, 2013)
-
Supporters of Immigration Bill Offer Amendment Focused on Women (June 20, 2013)
-
Immigration Law Changes Seen Cutting Billions From Deficit (June 19, 2013)
-
Savior or Saboteur? A Texas Senator Shakes Up the Immigration Debate (June 15, 2013)
Stephen Crowley/The New York Times
Strategically located down the hall from the Senate Judiciary Committee
in one of the city’s massive Congressional office buildings, the work
space normally reserved for the vice president is now the hub of a
stealthy legislative operation run by President Obama’s staff. Their goal is to quietly secure passage of the first immigration overhaul in a quarter century.
“We are trying hard not to be heavy handed about what we are doing,”
said Cecilia Muñoz, the director of the White House Domestic Policy
Council and the president’s point person on immigration.
Six years ago President George W. Bush publicly sent cabinet secretaries
to roam the Capitol building daily to try to woo Republican senators
for a similar immigration bill. But this time, high-profile help from
the White House is anathema to many Republicans who do not want to be
seen by constituents as carrying out the will of Mr. Obama.
So while lawmakers from both parties are privately relying on the White
House and its agencies to provide technical information to draft scores
of amendments to the immigration bill, few Republicans are willing to
admit it. Some are so eager to prove that the White House is not pulling
the strings that their aides say the administration is not playing any
role at all.
“President Obama’s concept of engaging Congress is giving a speech that
nobody up here listens to,” said Alex Conant, a spokesman for Senator
Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida, who is an important supporter of the
immigration legislation. “If passing legislation is like making
sausage, then this White House is like a bunch of vegetarians.”
As senators near a final tally on the 867-page bill before the July 4
holiday, immigration supporters acknowledge serious risks in Mr. Obama’s
approach: leaving the public advocacy for a major piece of his legacy
in the hands of others. If the bill fails to become law, Mr. Obama will
be open to criticism from Hispanics that he did not put the weight of
his office behind the legislation.
But Mr. Obama has made some careful public efforts, including a speech
last week at the White House in which he strongly endorsed the
legislation. On Tuesday while on Air Force One
in Europe, he called a Democratic negotiator, Senator Charles E.
Schumer of New York, to reinforce his opposition to part of a Republican
amendment that would have what the administration views as
unrealistically tough requirements for border security.
Inside Room 201, the administration has gathered a collection of its own
Congressional lobbyists, policy specialists and experts from an
alphabet soup of the agencies that will have to put the immigration
legislation into effect if it passes. They all moved into the vice
president’s offices on June 10, setting up laptop computers and thick
binders filled with proposed amendments on an oval conference table.
“We have folks who know the Senate really well, who know the players,
who have been through this before so they know exactly what Senate staff
needs,” Ms. Muñoz said. “We are deeply, deeply engaged.”
The group is led by Ed Pagano, Mr. Obama’s chief liaison to the Senate
and a former chief of staff to Senator Patrick J. Leahy, the Vermont
Democrat who is chairman of the Judiciary Committee. He is joined by
Felicia Escobar and Tyler Moran, senior advisers at the Domestic Policy
Council, and Esther Olavarria, director for immigration reform for the
National Security Council staff. Some days, Ms. Muñoz and Miguel
Rodriguez, the president’s chief Congressional liaison, are there too.
On one day this week, those at the table included two representatives
from the Justice Department, a homeland security official, a State
Department official and someone from the Department of Labor. Throughout
the day they pored through proposed amendments, offering suggestions to
the staff of the senators who offered them and flagging problems that
might arise.
At one point, Mr. Pagano, Ms. Escobar and the other White House advisers
huddled for 45 minutes in the smaller of the two rooms with Mr. Leahy’s
top aides. Working from spreadsheets, they discussed each of the 10
amendments that Mr. Leahy was likely to bring to the floor for a vote
that day.
“When Republican amendments are filed and we are trying to decide, ‘Can
we accept this? Can we accept this without some modifications?’ they are
the ones who tell us, ‘This is quite doable,’ ” said one Democratic
Senate leadership aide, who requested anonymity to talk about
legislative strategy.
- 1
- 2