A Collection of Information Available to the public. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness." This IS IT ~ TIME to reclaim our Freedom from an out of control Tyrannical Government. LIVE FREE and Fight the Good Fight To Keep That Right.
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Trying to stop the unauthorized wasteful duplicitous spendatures .. at the time
http://houselive.gov/ <<--- To see what's occurring in the Legislative Branch at any given time, etc.
Monday, May 7, 2012
U.S. Presidents Who Went to Law School
| School | President(s) |
|---|---|
| Albany Law School | |
| Columbia Law School |
|
| Duke University School of Law | |
| Georgetown University Law Center |
|
| Harvard Law School | |
| University of Cincinnati College of Law | |
| University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law |
|
| University of Virginia School of Law |
|
| Yale Law School |
Both Roosevelts withdrew, along with Harry Truman, Woodrow Wilson, and LBJ...
We know Obama was at Columbia if we are believe it all, then graduated from Harvard Law.. Looking at the List is even more confirmation that Presidents with Law degrees or Law School backgrounds haven't been our best, and the latest one, specializing i n Constitutional Law, obviously looked at it as training to find his was around it, to circumvent the Constitution and believe he could amend it and slash the very document that makes us the best of all the rest. Vote the anti-American law disrespecting and re-writing fraud OUT.
He is screaming Socialism like he's Hitler... He should be shamefully apologizing for his gaffes and promising the only Change to be away from the way he's rolled the entire first term. The worst President ever is Barack Hussein Obama, NO MORE.. HOPE for A CHANGE IN LEADERSHIP.. If Not, KNOW he's not possibly going to get re-elected without fraud, so fight it, demand a do-over, and then evoke the Second Amendment to save what's left of this great country.
Saturday, May 5, 2012
The Vomit Inducing Bin Laden kill glorified by Bill Clinton for Barack Obama
Not only did the sorry sack of Arkansas whack fail to follow up on leads to capture Bin Laden after his first attempt at the World Trade Center in 1996, this document was on his daily briefing desk in 1998 giving specific avenues for future attacks. The security checks implemented for the period of time anticipated by this piece of information were temporary. What a pathetic negligent POS -- Bill Clinton is one sorry waste of flesh, and so is the low life he's trying to support. Sleazy Slime Balls, both of them.
http://www.foia.cia.gov/docs/DOC_0001110635/DOC_0001110635.pdf
This one document was no doubt, one of many, and there's enough information in it to have given the skirt chasing sleaze hole a reason to implement at least some stronger restrictive procedures, especially when they had tested the unnamed, but high profile airport in NYC, easily passing all security check points. It's no doubt they took longer to prepare for an even larger attack with more dead and devastated when they realized their easy way in, and their ability to gain access.. Game changer.. Go Bill, you negligent POS.
DHS Informant talks about impending Civil War
http://www.trunews.com/listen_now.htm
 |  |
Recent Broadcasts:
Thursday May 3 , 2012
Guest: Lee Bellinger
Topic: Independent Living Chairman and Publisher Lee Bellinger discusses the domestic population surveillance and control grid being constructed throughout the U.S. based on military ops
| |
Wednesday May 2 , 2012
Guest: Doug Hagmann
Topic: Private investigator Doug Hagmann reveals some disturbing inside information and recent moves that indicate martial law may possibly be implemented before the year is finished
Ominous Osama Documents about World Domination Plans, Jihad and Obliteration of Americans
http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news/documents/2012/05/03/Osama_Raid_Documents.pdf
Page 1
(TN: Religious opening, then:)
Dear Brother Shaykh Mahmud, God protect him,
Peace be with you, and God's mercy and blessings.
I hope this letter finds you, your family and all the brothers
well and in good health, and closest and most obedient to God
Almighty.
I begin this message with condolences for myself and you on the
death of our dear brother Shaykh Sa'id, God rest his soul. May
the Almighty honor him with what he desires, accept him as one
of the martyrs, and count his forbearance and steadfastness
among his good deeds.
God bless him, he spent nearly three decades in the theater of
Jihad aiding the religion of God.
(TN: Rest of paragraph is a eulogy of the life and deeds of the
above Shaykh Sa'id.)
I also offer condolences on the deaths of our dear brothers Abu-
'Umar al-Baghdadi and Abu-Hamzah al-Muhajir and those who waged
Jihad with them until they died. We ask God Almighty to
compensate us for our hardship and bring some good from it for
us, and that he
Page 2
accept them among the martyrs and let them dwell in Heaven, for
He is most capable of that.
(TN: Paragraph seeking God's protection and guidance for all the
Mujahidin, then:)
In keeping with the words of the Prophet on forbearance, and to
fulfill our duties regardless of the hardship faced, I begin my
words with you on Jihad activities in general.
First, I wish to inform you that you have been appointed
successor to the departed Shaykh Sa'id for a period of two years
from the date on which you receive this letter. I ask Almighty
God to help you carry out this responsibility well, and augment
your success, forbearance, piety and good character which if the
leader possesses, his followers will benefit all the more so.
go to link for entire document: it's a long one, but worth the insight, if your life is worth anything.
Page 1
(TN: Religious opening, then:)
Dear Brother Shaykh Mahmud, God protect him,
Peace be with you, and God's mercy and blessings.
I hope this letter finds you, your family and all the brothers
well and in good health, and closest and most obedient to God
Almighty.
I begin this message with condolences for myself and you on the
death of our dear brother Shaykh Sa'id, God rest his soul. May
the Almighty honor him with what he desires, accept him as one
of the martyrs, and count his forbearance and steadfastness
among his good deeds.
God bless him, he spent nearly three decades in the theater of
Jihad aiding the religion of God.
(TN: Rest of paragraph is a eulogy of the life and deeds of the
above Shaykh Sa'id.)
I also offer condolences on the deaths of our dear brothers Abu-
'Umar al-Baghdadi and Abu-Hamzah al-Muhajir and those who waged
Jihad with them until they died. We ask God Almighty to
compensate us for our hardship and bring some good from it for
us, and that he
Page 2
accept them among the martyrs and let them dwell in Heaven, for
He is most capable of that.
(TN: Paragraph seeking God's protection and guidance for all the
Mujahidin, then:)
In keeping with the words of the Prophet on forbearance, and to
fulfill our duties regardless of the hardship faced, I begin my
words with you on Jihad activities in general.
First, I wish to inform you that you have been appointed
successor to the departed Shaykh Sa'id for a period of two years
from the date on which you receive this letter. I ask Almighty
God to help you carry out this responsibility well, and augment
your success, forbearance, piety and good character which if the
leader possesses, his followers will benefit all the more so.
go to link for entire document: it's a long one, but worth the insight, if your life is worth anything.
The Administration of Anti-American Agendas Carrying On as Denial Works Again.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/4/obamas-private-war/print/
NAPOLITANO: Obama’s private war
President’s drone killings in Pakistan could eventually happen here
Did you know the U.S. government is using drones to kill innocent people in Pakistan? Did you know the Pakistani government has asked President Obama to stop it and he won't? Did you know Pakistan is a sovereign country that has nuclear weapons and is an American ally?
Last week, the Obama administration not only acknowledged the use of the drones, it also revealed that it has plans to increase the frequency and ferocity of the attacks. White House counterterrorism adviser John O. Brennan argued that the attacks are "in full accordance with the law" and are not likely to be stopped anytime soon.
Mr. Brennan declined to say how many people were killed or just where the killings took place or who is doing them. But we know Mr. Obama has a morbid fascination with his plastic killing machines, and we know that those machines are among the favored tools of the CIA. We also know that if the president had been using the military to do this, he'd be legally compelled to reveal it to Congress and eventually to seek permission.
We know about the need to tell Congress and ask for permission because of the War Powers Act. This law, enacted in 1973 over President Nixon's veto, permits the president to use the military for 90 days before telling Congress and for 180 days before he needs congressional authorization. Mr. Obama must think he can bypass this law by using civilian CIA agents, rather than uniformed military, to do his killing.
The Constitution limits the presidential use of war powers to those necessary for an immediate defense of the United States or those exercised pursuant to a valid congressional declaration of war. In the case of Pakistan, the president has neither. International law prohibits entering a sovereign country without its consent. But Mr. Brennan argued that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), which Congress enacted in the aftermath of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, to enable President George W. Bush to pursue the perpetrators, is essentially carte blanche for any president to kill whomever he wants. The use of drones, rather than using the military or arresting those the government thinks have conspired to harm us, is a "surgical" technique that safeguards the innocent.
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. made a similar unconstitutional argument a few months ago when he stated in defense of the president's use of drones to kill Americansin Yemen that the AUMF, plus the careful consideration that the White House gives to the dimensions of each killing and the culpability of each person killed, somehow satisfied the Constitution's requirements for due process.
What monstrous nonsense all this is.
Those killings 10,000 miles from here hardly constitute self-defense and are not in pursuit of a declaration of war. So what has Congress done about this? Nothing. What have the courts done about this? Nothing.
Prior to the president's ordering the killing of the New Mexico-born and unindicted and uncharged Anwar al-Awlaki, the deceased's American father sued the president in federal district court and asked a judge to prevent the president from murdering his son in Yemen. After the judge dismissed the case, a CIA-fired drone killed al-Awlaki, his American companion and his 16-year-old American son.
In his three-plus years in office, Mr. Obama has launched 254 drones at persons in Pakistan, and collectively they have killed 1,277 persons there. The New America Foundation, a Washington think tank that monitors the presidential use of drones in Pakistan, estimates that between 11 percent and 17 percent of the drone victims are innocent Pakistani civilians. So much for Mr. Brennan's surgical strikes. So much for Mr. Holder's due process.
The president is waging a private war against private persons - even Americans - whose deaths he obviously thinks will keep America safe. But he is doing so without congressional authorization, in violation of the Constitution and in a manner that jeopardizes our freedom.
Who will keep us safe from a president who wants to use drones here? How long will it be before local American governments - 313 of which already possess drones - use them to kill here because they are surgical and a substitute for due process? Can you imagine the outcry if Cuba or China launched drones at their dissidents in Florida or California and used Mr. Obama's behavior in Pakistan as a justification?
How long will it be before even a semblance of our Constitution is gone?
Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst on the Fox News Channel. He is author of "It Is Dangerous to Be Right When the Government Is Wrong: The Case for Personal Freedom" (Thomas Nelson, 2011).
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/4/obamas-private-war/print/
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/4/obamas-private-war/print/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)